Figures of Speech HOME

Home

2018

2017

2016

The month 12

Scrapbook 12

Road to nowhere

Backup hell

Beyond analysis

Winter solstice

Judge Judy

Betjeman Christmas

Veiled Modesty

Energy made easy

Nobel Ceremony 2016

Schober? [9]

The month 11

Scrapbook 11

Word Of The Year

Man and machine

Cognitive dissonance

Schubert trajectory

No change

The month 10

Scrapbook 10

That man again

Freedom of speech

A victim remembers

The conquering hero

Schiaparelli

The Man in Black

Cox and Box

Bees pulling strings

Those formative years

John Dalton

The grape harvest

Babi Yar

Bible studies

Jacobin Conspiracy [6]

The month 09

Scrapbook 09

Wrong again

That Sappho thing

Rustling inspiration

Channelled speech

The houseman's friend

Wishful thinking

Churchill in Zurich

Franz's belljar

The other Spaun

Walking with Walser

Stephen McIntyre

The month 08

Scrapbook 08

Arthur Szyk

Climate alarmism

Citroen DS23

Artificial Intelligence

Portrait of the age

Shipwreck [7]

The month 07

Scrapbook 07

The Bastille Spirit

Classic books

Mechanics

Devaluing the family

Andrea Leadsom

Outrage

Habsburg cradle

UK politics

The month 06

Scrapbook 06

The Chosen Ones

Referendum mop up

Voters

Wonderment

Last words

Gretchen am Spinnrade

The alien hatches

Carbon dioxide

Ignorants

Electoral Commission

Sahra Wagenknecht

The green tick

The month 05

Scrapbook 05

The Sun Queen

Before Schubert [5]

European wars

Timelessness

Saving time

EU referendum

Protestant Ethic [9]

The month 04

Scrapbook 04

Cherry blossom

Dark chocolate

Out of the swamp

Richard North

Do not sleep

Imperial chemistry

Lili Marleen

The Habsburg lip

The month 03

Scrapbook 03

Bedsheet, spreadsheet

French dodo

Lenten thoughts

Heinrich Heine

The great survivor

The Swiss muddle

Hans Erni

Switzerland defused

Tristram's bad start

Montségur [5]

The month 02

Scrapbook 02

Frosty wreck

Language lab

Referendum reloaded

Graven images

Die Forelle [5]

The grass on the weirs

The month 01

Rabid lexicography

Not like us

Language lab

IKEA's loose screw

Nathan's rings

Brief Encounter II

Mohammed, not my prophet

Lunatic calendars

Hidden Hemingway

Sharing the risk

Bathtime for St. Kevin

The dismal science

The below above

Sanitised swearing

Souvenirs

Rockers do it better

2015


Updated content

Contents list

Site search

Blogroll

About


Schubert collection

Home | 2016

The Tory Chosen Ones

Posted by Thersites on UTC 2016-06-28 10:35.

Whilst slumped in a chair yesterday waiting for the microwave to perform its secret ministry I got myself heated up with speculations about the malign effect of the tight central control over the selection of its election candidates which the Conservative party has pushed through in the course of the last decade or so.

During this time local associations, previously the backbone of solid Tory thought among the people, have been increasingly sidelined by diktat from Conservative Central Office. Lists of centrally approved applicants were imposed upon the rank and file, all-women lists, 'diverse' lists and so on. These measures were part of the 'modernisation' of the party – 'Blairisation', if your prefer. We were told that the 'Turnip Taliban' had no place in the modern, 'progressive' party.

Central control has serious consequences for the representation function of MPs. If the candidates do not truly represent the interests and preferences of their constituency what role do they play in Parliament apart from just representing the leaders of their party?

There is a reason that there is so much anecdotal and electoral anger among the grass roots of the party.

We might expect these leadership-approved, 'modern' MPs to be either more gratefully supine in following the party line or simply share the same mindset as the party leaders. How loyal were they to their masters in the government-backed Remain campaign in the EU Referendum?

Hypothesis testing time

Merging Guido's list of the voting intentions of Conservative MPs in the EU Referendum with the Wikipedia list of MPs by their first election year produced the following table:

Entry Remain Leave ND
1970 1 0 0
1974 2 0 0
1983 3 4 0
1987 2 3 0
1992 7 8 0
1997 10 13 0
2001 10 11 0
2005 33 18 0
2010 76 53 2
2015 42 31 1

Putting it graphically:

EU Referendum, Tory Remain-Leave with seniority

The numbers of MPs who entered Parliament before 2005 show an almost perfect 50:50 split on the issue in the EU Referendum of 2016. In contrast, those who entered in 2005 or after show show a striking divergence.

The obvious fact is that suddenly from 2005 intake onwards there was an appreciable majority of Conservative MPs who went on to support the official Remain policy in the 2016 Referendum.

Whilst I would not claim that these figures 'proved' the hypothesis that the candidates chosen under central control were either supine or orthodox group-thinkers, there is nevertheless food for thought there. Perhaps the central control in recent years did change the soul of the Conservative party.

And if that is so, then if, when and whenever there is a general election the malign CCHQ stranglehold on candidate selection has to be relaxed so that local associations can take into account the Europhile affinity of their applicants and select accordingly.