Figures of Speech HOME

Home

2018

2017

2016

The month 12

Scrapbook 12

Road to nowhere

Backup hell

Beyond analysis

Winter solstice

Judge Judy

Betjeman Christmas

Veiled Modesty

Energy made easy

Nobel Ceremony 2016

Schober? [9]

The month 11

Scrapbook 11

Word Of The Year

Man and machine

Cognitive dissonance

Schubert trajectory

No change

The month 10

Scrapbook 10

That man again

Freedom of speech

A victim remembers

The conquering hero

Schiaparelli

The Man in Black

Cox and Box

Bees pulling strings

Those formative years

John Dalton

The grape harvest

Babi Yar

Bible studies

Jacobin Conspiracy [6]

The month 09

Scrapbook 09

Wrong again

That Sappho thing

Rustling inspiration

Channelled speech

The houseman's friend

Wishful thinking

Churchill in Zurich

Franz's belljar

The other Spaun

Walking with Walser

Stephen McIntyre

The month 08

Scrapbook 08

Arthur Szyk

Climate alarmism

Citroen DS23

Artificial Intelligence

Portrait of the age

Shipwreck [7]

The month 07

Scrapbook 07

The Bastille Spirit

Classic books

Mechanics

Devaluing the family

Andrea Leadsom

Outrage

Habsburg cradle

UK politics

The month 06

Scrapbook 06

The Chosen Ones

Referendum mop up

Voters

Wonderment

Last words

Gretchen am Spinnrade

The alien hatches

Carbon dioxide

Ignorants

Electoral Commission

Sahra Wagenknecht

The green tick

The month 05

Scrapbook 05

The Sun Queen

Before Schubert [5]

European wars

Timelessness

Saving time

EU referendum

Protestant Ethic [9]

The month 04

Scrapbook 04

Cherry blossom

Dark chocolate

Out of the swamp

Richard North

Do not sleep

Imperial chemistry

Lili Marleen

The Habsburg lip

The month 03

Scrapbook 03

Bedsheet, spreadsheet

French dodo

Lenten thoughts

Heinrich Heine

The great survivor

The Swiss muddle

Hans Erni

Switzerland defused

Tristram's bad start

Montségur [5]

The month 02

Scrapbook 02

Frosty wreck

Language lab

Referendum reloaded

Graven images

Die Forelle [5]

The grass on the weirs

The month 01

Rabid lexicography

Not like us

Language lab

IKEA's loose screw

Nathan's rings

Brief Encounter II

Mohammed, not my prophet

Lunatic calendars

Hidden Hemingway

Sharing the risk

Bathtime for St. Kevin

The dismal science

The below above

Sanitised swearing

Souvenirs

Rockers do it better

2015


Updated content

Contents list

Site search

Blogroll

About


Schubert collection

Home | 2016

Mohammed: not my prophet

Posted by Thersites on UTC 2016-01-17 13:50. Updated on UTC 2016-02-06

Isn't it irritating hearing non-Muslims use the term the 'Prophet Mohammed'? Isn't it even more irritating listening to the moderators of public broadcasting programmes in the West do the same? Unless they are Muslims he is not their prophet, and even if they are Muslims they should use the religiously neutral form 'Mohammed' (or 'Muhammud' or… whatever).

Non-Christians are not expected to refer to the 'Lord Jesus [Christ]'. Devout Christians might do so, but even they would probably temper their language when speaking in situations requiring religious neutrality (such as news broadcasts) by speaking of 'Jesus' or 'Jesus Christ' or just 'Christ'.

It is true: there are an awful lot of Mohammeds in the world, but in practice I have never experienced an occasion when I would have confused the founder of Islam with the fella in the corner shop. If I wrote on Twitter that 'Mohammed married a nine-year-old girl', Mohammed in the corner shop would not expect a dawn raid – whereas I probably might.

Jesus is not a rare name either, but again, I have never experienced an occasion when I would have confused the founder of Christianity with some South American footballer.

Yet I have the feeling that Hell will freeze over – to use a theological phrase – before Muslims either speak of the 'Lord Jesus' or accept the use of the bare 'Mohammed' for the name of their founder.

As so often these days, western civilisation has voluntarily entered into an asymmetric deference. No one at all – Christian, atheist or Muslim – will complain about 'Good Friday commemorates the crucifixion of Jesus', whereas the BBC feels obliged to write 'Prophet Muhammad cartoons – right or wrong?'. Imagine the confusion if they had just written 'Muhammad cartoons – right or wrong?'. Er… none whatsoever.

Let's stop this insidious cultural appeasement right now.

If this seems too disrespectful, perhaps we can find a solution in Donald Trump's current campaign for the Republican nomination as their Presidential candidate for the upcoming elections.

As a reflection of his iconic stature he is frequently called 'The Donald'. This epithet avoids all possible confusion with people and ducks. What about 'The Jesus', 'The Mohammed'. We have 'The Buddha' already, so the job is partly done. Unfortunately this helpful and well intentioned suggestion probably belongs in this website's list of hopeless causes, a list growing longer by the day.

Update 06.02.2016

BBC Style Guide Tells Journos: Mohammed Is 'The Prophet', No Mention For 'Son Of God' Jesus
Nick Hallett, Breitbart: The BBC Style Guide (5 Feb 2016)

Under the section labelled 'Muhammad', the guide says: 'For the founder of Islam, our style is the Prophet Muhammad; at second reference Muhammad or the Prophet.'

This advice is repeated in the sections on 'Arabic names' and 'Islam'.

The assertion that Mohammed is 'the Prophet', with a capital P, will likely cause controversy. While followers of Islam believe him to be the last prophet sent by God – Christians, Jews, atheists and followers of other religions do not regard him as a prophet at all.

There are also questions over whether Mohammed and Islam are being given special treatment in the style guide, which does not tell journalists how to refer to significant figures from other religions.

It does not, for example, tell staff to refer to Jesus as 'Son of God', 'Our Lord' or 'The Messiah', nor does it say to call the Buddha by any of his Ten Titles, or offer any advice on how to refer to holy figures from Hinduism or Sikhism.